Archive for July 9, 2012


RSS

“The South has no intention of separating from the North, for had that been the case, nothing on earth would have prevented the demand for separation. The South will at any moment separate from the North if and when the North so decides, directly or indirectly, through political, social and economic subjection of the South” Father Saturnino Lohure Hilangi, the spiritual father of South Sudanese’ liberation struggle, on the 2nd Sudan parliament (1958).

By PaanLuel Wël, Washington DC, USA, Planet Earth

On this special occasion, marking the first Independent Day Anniversary of the Republic of South Sudan, this special day is a towering tribute to the fallen heroes and heroines led by Dr. John Garang de Mabioor Atem whose blood watered and flesh nourished the tree of liberty under whose shelter we celebrate this day; an unsurpassed gratitude to the gallant SPLM/A war veterans led by Comrade Salva Kiir Mayaardit that remained loyal to the SPLM/A—by sticking to the cause they went to the bush to struggle for—without which the Republic of South Sudan might not have seen the light of this day; a sincere appreciation to the SPLM/A returnees under Dr. Riek Machar Teny without which the fruits of the CPA might not have materialized; a big congratulatory message to President Salva Kiir Mayaardit for serenely guiding South Sudanese people across the turbulent waters of River Jordan into the Promised Land; a heartfelt homage to the Torit Mutineers—the Equatoria Corps—of 1955, to Father Saturnino Lohure Hilangi and to Joseph Lagu Yanga of Anyanya One Movement, our beloved forefathers-in-arms who implanted the everlasting seed of South Sudanese’ liberation struggle; and above all, a celebratory kudos to the very determined and most loyal masses of South Sudan for their unyielding support and precious contributions to the liberation of the Republic of South Sudan. To you all, we owe everything. In your cherished memory and highest honor we commemorate this day. In your battled-tested spirit we promise to build and protect this country. So help us Nhialic; history is our witness! A reflective, soul-searching, but a happy, Independent Day to all and each of us; we made it to Canaan—though one deprived of milk and honey!

“I and those who joined me in the bush and fought for more than twenty years, have brought to you CPA in a golden plate. Our mission is accomplished. It is now your turn, especially those who did not have a chance to experience bush life. When the time comes to vote at the referendum, it is your golden choice to determine your fate. Would you like to vote to be second class citizens in your own country? It is absolutely your choice”—-Dr. John Garang speaking to South Sudanese people in Rumbek, May 15, 2005, about the just-signed CPA and the right choice to be made by the South Sudanese people in the then forthcoming referendum which, unfortunately, he never participated in.


July 9th 2012,: Speech delivered by Lt. Gen. Paul Malong Awan, Governor of Northern Bahr el Ghazal State on 1st Independent Anniversary of Republic of South Sudan

Right Honorable Acting Speaker of NBGS Assembly
H.E President of High Court NBGS/Aweil
Honorable, Advisors, Ministers & Independence Commissions Chairpersons
Honorable Members of Parliament
Political Parties
UN Agencies and NGOs
State Security Organs 
Distinguished guests
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Before I begin my speech, let us stand up and observe a minute of silence to remember our fallen heroes and heroines who paid the ultimate price in the cause of long struggle. Thank you.
Fellow citizens, ladies and gentlemen,
On this historic day and occasion, I would like to first and foremost express my special tribute to our fallen martyrs, on top of whom is our dear leader Dr. John Garang Mabior, whose sacrifices brought us this Independence Day. I also wish to equally express my sincere thanks and appreciations to wounded heroes and heroines for their brave sacrifices throughout the long war and to our gallant forces who bravely continue to protect the territorial integrity of the Republic of South Sudan. I would equally like to register my sincere thanks to the people of Northern Bahr El Ghazal State for their remarkable contributions and perseverance in untold suffering during the war.
One year ago, South Sudan became the world’s newest nation. Many people wondered how the young nation would progress. Some thought we would not make it as a nation and that we might be a failed State. But today as we celebrate this 1st Independence Anniversary, we can confidently pronounce that we have proven our critics wrong – we have succeeded.
Many attempts were made by enemies of South Sudan to fail us as a nation. One most notable among these is the Republic of Sudan which continues to project a serious security threat to our sovereignty but they will fail. You are all aware that prices in the market have continuously risen. This did not happen by chance. It was a design by Sudan to destroy us economically. You are aware that Republic of Sudan has imposed economic blockade on South Sudan since last year by closing their border with us. The North also went as far as openly stealing our oil which forced our government to shutdown oil production. These were attempts by the Sudan to try to shock us economically.
Ironically, however, the Republic of Sudan is worse off today than South Sudan. You have heard of demonstrations in most part of Sudan in the last couple of weeks. These demonstrations are a clear manifestation of frustration by the people with the regime’s failed policies. The government of the Republic of South Sudan has major plans to address the current economic situation. Before we celebrate our 2nd Independent Anniversary next year, we shall have our oil refinery up and running here in South Sudan and the question of fuel shortages shall be solved once and for all.
Ladies and Gentlemen,

Let me remind you that there is no short cut to economic prosperity. We can only become prosperous nation if we accept to work hard. We are a nation blessed with abundant natural resources including arable land for agriculture. If we all go to farm and cultivate, we shall definitely become the bread basket for the whole of East African region. I am therefore asking all of you to give agriculture a priority it deserves. I must also acknowledge that majority of our people have successfully tilted their farms this year. This is a great achievement. Youth must stop wasting times playing cards and dominoes. Everybody must cultivate in order for us to eradicate hunger in this State.
What is freedom if we fail to liberate ourselves from hunger? We took up arms against Khartoum regimes for more than 50 years because we did not have freedom to decide for ourselves. We are now a year old as free and independent people, will it make sense if we refuse to work and continue pointing fingers at others? Building South Sudan requires that all of us work hard. In so doing, we shall all appreciate the meaning of freedom.
I am aware of enormous task we have ahead of us. After attaining the independence, we are required as a government to delivery basic services to the people. In this regard, my government will continue pursuing policies and strategies that will expedite the delivery of basic services to the community particularly in areas of equipped health facilities, schools, clean water and efficient road network. In this one year of independent, we have made a lot of efforts to provide services to our people but our efforts were adversely affected when tension between the Republic of Sudan and South Sudan heightened which culminated in total shutdown of oil production.
We will also continue to give special attention to our security. When I came to this State in my current capacity, I made a pledge that security of the State would top the list of my priorities and this has not changed. Development only happens when security situation is stable. I thank the people of this State for being law abiding citizens. Your peaceful orientation has made this State an exemplary one. You continue promoting peace in your communities and with your neighbors.
Last but not least, I would like to express my special appreciation to our friends and allies of SPLM/A who firmly stood with us during our darkest hours of need and to all partner agencies which are doing special role of filling the gap created by the long war. I encourage our allies, friends and partners to continue supporting us as we transition toward fulfilling the dreams of our people.
Finally, I would like to sincerely thank the families of our fallen martyrs for without their heroic sacrifices this day would not have been realized. I urged all of you, citizens of Northern Bahr El Ghazal State, to remain united and work together in order for us to collectively build this nation. This is the only way we can thank those who sacrifice so much for this freedom.

Thank you.


Dear all,
Here attached is the final statement that contained the Alliance’s resolutions.
It is now public and you can distribute it widely and for more questions, direct them to us on above emails.

Best,
Biel Boutros Biel,

Press statement on the Kidnapping of Deng Athuai Mawiir.pdf


(Reuters) – In December, the people of this town watched the national army stand by while thousands of young men from a rival ethnic group stormed in for a cattle raid. The interlopers shot and macheted hundreds of people, burned homes and stole tens of thousands of cows. One month on, the state minister for law enforcement arrived in this part of eastern South Sudan to convince residents that the fledgling nation’s new government was ready to help – and that they should give up their weapons. Gabriel Duop, a man built like a refrigerator, sat behind a wooden desk in a dirt field, a notebook in front of him. “We are the government,” he told the crowd. “And we want peace.” But the people wanted answers. Who, they asked, would protect them when the raiders returned? That the citizens of the world’s newest nation are making such demands is both a sign of progress and an indication of how far South Sudan has to go. Cattle raids are centuries old in the region. The expectation that a central government can and should halt them is much newer.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/09/us-south-sudan-governed-idUSBRE86806Q20120709

Special Report: For the world’s newest nation, a rocky start

Peter Kaka, an SPLA Murle soldier, sits in his newly built home in Pibor, South Sudan, June 26, 2012. REUTERS-Adriane Ohanesian

Mon Jul 9, 2012 9:50am EDT

(This is the first in a series of articles: “Birthing a Nation – South Sudan’s first year.”)

By Alexander Dziadosz

(Reuters) – In December, the people of this town watched the national army stand by while thousands of young men from a rival ethnic group stormed in for a cattle raid. The interlopers shot and macheted hundreds of people, burned homes and stole tens of thousands of cows.

One month on, the state minister for law enforcement arrived in this part of eastern South Sudan to convince residents that the fledgling nation’s new government was ready to help – and that they should give up their weapons.

Gabriel Duop, a man built like a refrigerator, sat behind a wooden desk in a dirt field, a notebook in front of him.

“We are the government,” he told the crowd. “And we want peace.”

But the people wanted answers. Who, they asked, would protect them when the raiders returned?

That the citizens of the world’s newest nation are making such demands is both a sign of progress and an indication of how far South Sudan has to go. Cattle raids are centuries old in the region. The expectation that a central government can and should halt them is much newer.

For decades, Sudan’s southerners fought the country’s predominately Arab rulers in the north. More than 2 million people died before the fighting ended in a peace deal in 2005. In a referendum promised by the pact, 99 percent of southerners chose to secede. And on July 9, 2011, the flag of South Sudan was raised over Juba, the rickety new capital.

In a series of articles, Reuters is chronicling the first year in the life of South Sudan – and assessing the odds of whether it will flourish or fail.

This country of about 8 million people has several things going for it – fertile soil, rich petroleum reserves and backing from the United States and other wealthy international donors.

But in many ways, South Sudan’s creation was a wild act of optimism. The landlocked country is embroiled in an often violent dispute with its old rulers in Sudan. Just one in four people are literate. Running water and hospital beds are scarce. And in a nation the size of France, there are only about 300 km (190 miles) of tarmac roads.

In short, there’s every possibility South Sudan could join the ranks of the world’s failed states, adding to instability in a part of the world already dogged by separatist rebellions, Islamist militants, corruption and poverty.

The first year of independence has brought hope and pride, but also graft and missteps – not least an economically disastrous dispute with Sudan over oil that has threatened to turn into a new war. The row has led Juba to shut down its oil industry, which provided an astonishing 98 percent of state income. Domestic crises like the murderous cattle raid in Pibor have tested the government’s ability to provide the most fundamental of services, security.

The first year has also brought questions about what it means to be a citizen of South Sudan. This is especially true in states such as Jonglei, where Pibor lies. There, smaller tribes have long had a tense relationship with the country’s two biggest, the Dinka and the Nuer, which dominate the government.

Most of Pibor’s residents are Murle (pronounced “mur-lay”), numbering an estimated 150,000 people.

In interviews with dozens of Murle leaders and citizens, most remained hopeful their new government would bring development and security. But many were frustrated about broken promises and increasingly worried they might have traded one set of remote and neglectful rulers for another. Crucially, the government has so far failed to convince every South Sudanese that they belong.

“We don’t have roads, we don’t have hospitals,” said Peter Gazulu, a Murle who is close to some of the group’s most influential leaders. “Why are we denied representation? Why are we denied development? … We fought 21 years for democracy and freedom for all, so why has it become a democracy for the few?”

Officials in the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement, the ruling party, dismiss charges of neglect and say frictions among the nation’s ethnic groups are rooted in years of misrule by the Sudanese government in Khartoum. With time and control of its resources, South Sudan can overcome this.

The post-raid meeting in Pibor suggests that won’t be easy.

So deep was the lack of trust in the central government, one woman said she had almost been too scared to show up. She suggested Vice President Riek Machar, a Nuer, had played a role in the raids – a claim few outside the town take seriously.

Machar had addressed a meeting in Pibor in December and assured people the town would be safe, the woman said. But the raiders stormed in just days later.

“The vice president arrived here, and those people came right away,” she said, drawing applause from the crowd that hugged the shade of a neem tree.

Machar’s office did not respond to requests for an interview, but he and other officials have said he went to Pibor to try to persuade the attackers to go home. The heavily armed young men refused.

When people had finished airing their grievances, Duop, the state law minister, stood to speak. The sun poured down on him and the crowd.

Officials were working with aid agencies, talking to the media, doing everything they could to help, he said. The government planned to deploy troops between the Nuer and Murle to prevent more raids, and would even consider a Murle request to split the region off into its own state.

Rumors that Machar had assisted his fellow Nuer in the raid were nonsense, Duop said. “Riek Machar loves his people … Now we have our own nation, and we don’t want our people to die.”

Duop said he would take the same message to a large Nuer town.

At the end of the minister’s speech, people clapped politely and a couple of men approached to shake his hand.

“Good meeting,” Duop said, and smiled as people filed out.

When the field had mostly emptied, Samuel Chachin, a tall, balding pastor with a thin moustache, approached a reporter.

The people did not believe the state minister, he said.

THE IMPORTANCE OF COWS

Pibor is poor even for South Sudan.

In the dry season, the sun bakes the dirt roads so hard they feel like pavement. In the wet season, rain turns the ground to mud. The air buzzes with insects. Place an apple core on the ground and within a minute it will turn black with flies and ants.

Children in stained, tattered rags fashion toy pickup trucks out of rusted vegetable oil tins stamped “USAID,” the acronym of the U.S. government aid agency. Most of the real pickups belong to aid groups, the United Nations or the national army.

All but a few people live in one-room, stick-and-mud huts.

“People still have that life of a long time ago,” said David Adoch, a stocky man working as an administrator at the Pibor county government headquarters who put his age around 36.

Most people grow their own food and get by without needing much money. A well-paid government worker or trader – about the only people who use cash – might expect to make 700 South Sudanese pounds a month, or around $140 at recent black market rates. Sorghum, a staple food, now costs over five pounds ($1) a kilo in parts of Jonglei state.

Part of the area’s poverty owes to its isolation. Trucking in basic materials like cement and iron sheeting is costly. It is a common problem in South Sudan, and one reason the state has virtually no presence outside the three or four main centers.

Foreign aid agencies provide almost all the basic services in Pibor, including water and health services. “If we’re not there, there is simply no health care,” Karel Janssens, a field coordinator for Doctors Without Borders, said of a Murle village near Pibor.

The harsh terrain and remoteness are not the only cause of the area’s sense of isolation and neglect. During the civil war, many Murle sided with Khartoum against the southern rebels, who were led and dominated by the Dinka. That rivalry with the bigger groups, as well as a history of back-and-forth cattle raiding, has left a legacy of animosity and prejudice.

Cows are everything in South Sudan. For Murle and other tribes, cattle are part of nearly every social structure and basic desire: wealth, marriage, status, influence.

A Murle man’s family is expected to pay a dowry of cattle to his bride’s family. Cow milk mixed with cow blood is a prized drink. If a Murle commits murder, he compensates the victim’s family in cows.

“If you have just 10 cows, people will not consider you. You’re like a spoon – only for eating and throwing down. You cannot eat also. You’re for using,” said Joseph, a local government worker, with a laugh. “If you have many cows, people will respect you. They’ll greet you in a respectful way.”

Raids and counter-raids have cycled for centuries, gradually becoming bloodier as guns and satellite phones flooded in and young men became less responsive to local elders’ pleas for them to stop. With no real chance for people to appeal to the law when rivals steal their cows, the incentive to steal back is high.

THE “WHITE ARMY”

In the December raid, an estimated 6,000 to 8,000 young men from the Lou-Nuer – a sub-group of the Nuer – marched on Murle territory. They called themselves the “White Army,” a name first taken by another Nuer group during the civil war whose fighters smeared white ash on their torsos to guard against insects.

On December 23, as pastor Chachin and church members in his hometown of Lekwanglei practised songs and prepared food for Christmas, Murle started to arrive from the north. They were injured and had stories of carnage.

“The people were running. They said, ‘The Nuer are coming now,'” Chachin recalled. His family and other villagers walked through the night the 40 km (25 miles) or so to Pibor. There, he and his wife, Rebecca, and their five children moved into a small hut near the main church. By December 31, raiders had arrived at the town’s outskirts. The family fled again.

“You could see the smoke. They were burning the houses,” Chachin said of the raid on Pibor.

The Doctors Without Borders clinic and dozens of homes were ransacked. Pastor Chachin said raiders shot his mother as she fled across a river, killing her.

Another man, Lela Agolo, said his wife and children were shot dead while sleeping in the grass after fleeing their village.

The attackers began withdrawing on January 3. “They were able to do so unchallenged and have continued to enjoy impunity,” the human rights division of the U.N. Mission in South Sudan reported last month.

The scale of the damage was dramatic. Lekwanglei was reduced to little more than a field of cow bones, crushed jerry cans, and the blackened remains of huts. The village school, one of few concrete structures, was smashed and burned, its walls covered in graffiti. “We are not going to leave,” one slogan read.

Kurkur Golla, who put her age at around 60, said she had witnessed cattle raids since her youth. Back then, she said, “The young people were not like these. They only came and took cattle. They didn’t kill children and old people.”

Mediators stress that the conflict is far from one-sided. The rampage was the latest in a series of tit-for-tat attacks that many say was triggered by a 2009 Murle raid on the Lou-Nuer.

“Lou-Nuer do go and raid, and Murle do go and raid,” said Gatwech Koak Nyuon, a member of the Nuer Peace Council, a local group that has tried to end the violence.

The death toll is disputed. Pibor’s commissioner, Joshua Konyi, put the figure at 3,141. The U.N. human rights report said there were 612 confirmed deaths in the attacks on Murle settlements, although more deaths had been reported. Another 276 people died in revenge attacks on Lou-Nuer and Dinka communities, it said.

Murle were particularly bitter that neither South Sudan’s army, which is stationed in both Lekwanglei and Pibor, nor the local contingent of U.N. peacekeepers, were able to halt the onslaught.

Several survivors claimed Nuer members of the national army had joined in the raids.

Peter Kaka, a 32-year-old Murle soldier in the army, was stationed in Pibor and there during the raid. He said he and the other troops had been given orders to hold back and not intervene, but he did not know why.

“It was a surprise to the (Pibor) community,” he said. “When we were brought from Juba, we were told by our commanders that we were going to deploy in different areas so that we would defend them from external attack. We did nothing. We were just like a throat which is not swallowing the food.”

The Sudan People’s Liberation Army, as South Sudan’s national army is called, says its 400 to 600 soldiers did not intervene because they were outnumbered by the well-armed and organized attackers. A lack of roads and transport made it impossible, despite U.N. warnings, to mobilize enough troops to protect civilians.

Army spokesman Philip Aguer said any order to confront the raiders head-on would have been a “suicidal act.” Aguer said 11 soldiers were reported to have deserted amid the attacks. “Whether they joined the fighters, we are not sure,” he said. The government has since sent thousands of soldiers to Jonglei to prevent further attacks.

The U.N. mission says it did everything it could and that its presence stopped raiders from attacking people inside the center of Pibor.

“The combined use of deterrence, early warning and show of force did protect civilians,” the mission’s spokesman said in an emailed comment. The primary responsibility for protecting the country’s civilians, he added, “remains with its young government.”

A “NEW SUDAN”

During colonial rule, British administrators tried to keep the south and its patchwork of tribes separate from the largely Arabic north. When London granted independence in 1956, it left an Arab government in Khartoum, which reneged on a promise of a federal state. War between north and south battered the country until a peace agreement in 1972.

In 1983, John Garang, a charismatic southerner in the Sudanese national army, led a mutiny that reignited the conflict. With other commanders, Garang, a Dinka, built the rebel army into a force to take on Khartoum.

Garang imagined a “New Sudan” that would embrace democracy and give every ethnic and religious group equal sway. Unlike many of his fellow rebels, he opposed secession and wanted to remake the country as a unified whole.

Two decades of fighting followed until a peace deal was signed in 2005. Soon after, Garang died in a helicopter crash. His deputy, Salva Kiir, who had been keener on secession, took over.

Garang’s photo still hangs on the walls of offices and government buildings in Juba, but with secession, his vision of a multi-ethnic, unified Sudan died.

Kiir, now president, says he is committed to building an inclusive state in South Sudan. But for people like Akot Maze, the 47-year-old former commissioner of Pibor county, it’s not the same.

Maze was in secondary school when the civil war restarted. Like thousands of other students, he was caught up in the revolutionary fervor. A stint in the nascent Sudan People’s Liberation Army transformed how he thought about identity and tribe.

“Eventually, every student from Bor, from Equatoria, from Malakal, from Khartoum, we just met in the bush,” he said. The aim was to make a nation in which people “don’t know what tribe they belong to, but know what country they belong to.”

Two years into the peace deal, Maze was appointed commissioner of Pibor county. He expected peace would bring development and link the region to the rest of the south.

But in the six years between the peace deal and independence last year, his hopes have faded.

Officials from South Sudan’s government-in-waiting promised new projects, but rarely delivered. When Kiir visited Pibor in 2007, he promised two primary schools, a secondary school and a hospital, to be named after a prominent Murle commander, Maze said. None of it has been built. A plaque to mark the site of the hospital is crumbling, the name of the would-be building erased by the sun and rain.

Maze’s frustration led to a dispute with Jonglei state governor Kuol Manyang, one of the army’s most powerful commanders. The governor sacked Maze last year. Maze said he had accused the state of discrimination against the Murle, and suspected he was being punished for speaking up.

Manyang said the two did not have a good working relationship and that Maze had not been cooperating. “It’s not the first time for a person to be shuffled,” Manyang said.

Maze left his post in December, just days before the Nuer raiders reached Pibor.

A FAMILIAR PATTERN

Several hours after state security minister Duop spoke to Pibor residents about the cattle raid, he sat down with Joshua Konyi, the commissioner who replaced Maze. The two old soldiers had fought side-by-side in a 1987 battle in which the SPLA captured Pibor from the pro-north, largely Murle militia that controlled the area for most of the war. Now they sat outside in the fading light, sipping tea from plastic cups.

“The first place where I shot a bullet was here, in Pibor,” said Duop, who put his age at around 14 at the time. Duop talked about his friendship with Konyi, a Murle, and how the camaraderie of the war years was evidence that divisions between South Sudan’s diverse people could be overcome.

But in other ways he seemed dismissive of the country’s smaller ethnic groups.

“I know why we fought the war. We fought to liberate these people,” he said. “We are not in a position to let them kill themselves because of ignorance and poverty.”

Murle leaders agree a lack of economic opportunity is the main reason for the violence, but say Duop and the government miss an important point: For all its talk about peace and security and development, the government seems unable to deliver the most basic services.

Instead, they say, authorities rely on short-sighted and unworkable disarmament campaigns managed by the army, a sprawling organization made up of former militias.

After the raids, Murle leaders requested a peace conference with the Lou-Nuer to try to avoid any more attacks. But before that happened, the government had begun collecting guns from locals, including policemen. To many, it was a familiar pattern.

“They have no long-term plan,” Maze said of the government’s reaction.

Without more progress, some Murle may start to turn against the ruling party, he said. “We try to convince them that the government is a government of all, not a government of Dinka or Nuer. But that feeling is there.”

The sense of alienation has left people like pastor Chachin worried about the future. By April, he was planning how he might send his children away, to escape the violence and poverty. Yei, a town in the south near the border with Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, sounded promising, he said.

Maze had begun considering ways he might rejoin the national army, and was less pessimistic. But he did not expect much from the government.

“Now to talk about opening roads to the area, to talk about opening a school, to talk about opening a clinic, hospital and all that – I think it is a dream,” he said.

(Edited by Simon Robinson and Michael Williams)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/09/us-south-sudan-governed-idUSBRE86806Q20120709


By John Thon Majok 

Mixed tears of joy and sadness irrepressibly fell when the flag of South Sudan was proudly raised on July 9, 2011, marking the long-awaited independence from Sudan. There was an exciting joy for what was achieved, but also a feeling of sadness because people recalled the majority of those who made the independence possible but they were not there to witness the triumph of freedom. On this first anniversary of our independence, it is fitting to celebrate our freedom while reflecting on the long torturous history and the process it took to earn it.

I believe the combination of 3B’s – bullet, blood, ballot – led to South Sudan independence. It was through the bullets that the central regime in Khartoum accepted the ballot box, thanks to our martyrs whose blood was shed in the name of freedom from oppression.

When the dissatisfied South Sudanese mutinied in Torit and fired the first bullet on August 18, 1955, they risked their lives for a cause greater than themselves and went into the bush to form the Anyanya I Movement. When the rights of the southerners were not properly addressed by the Khartoum regime during the 1972 Addis Ababa Agreement, the second phase of civil started with the revolution of May 16, 1983 in Bor. This led to the formation of Sudan People Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M), which fought the war for more than 20 years until the Khartoum regime convincingly accepted to sign the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2005.

It is indisputable that the bullets made it possible for the peace agreement to be achieved. In turn, the CPA paved the way for the ballot through a referendum in which 99% of South Sudanese overwhelmingly voted for separation. This democratic exercise, which surprised the naysayers who thought it would be impossible, answered the two basic questions asked by South Sudan founding father Dr John Garang: “If unity is not made attractive, why would any southerner vote himself into second class citizenship? If Sudan does not sufficiently and fundamentally change, why should anybody vote to become a servant instead of being a master in his own independent house?” Today, we are in our own independent house as masters and equal citizens. This prize of freedom came with enormous price and cost.  More than 2 million southerners have died, millions were wounded, and more than 4 million were uprooted from their homes.

Our brave freedom fighters from Anyanya I to numerous SPLA battalions died with honor so that their fellow citizens can live in freedom. This last sentence from the 1776 U.S. Declaration of Independence is true of our martyrs: “We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” Today, we are celebrating what these heroes have achieved with their lives, fortunes, and honor on our behalf. What could be more than the loss of life?

During their struggle, South Sudanese were united by a shared sacrifice and a visionary narrative that cemented their spirit of nationalism and patriotism. As Kenyan human rights lawyer Maina Kiai rightly put it, “No country becomes a nation without a common accepted narrative that goes beyond individuals. When there is a narrative that provides a sense of sharedness, then the sense of nationhood cements itself.” Today is a time to reflect on our sense of sharedness.

On July 9, more than half a century of war came to a dignified finish. It is imperative to point out some of the main causes, which compelled South Sudanese to declare independence from Sudan:

  • Political and economic marginalization, characterized by historical bad governance.
  • Imposition of Islamic religious practices and Arab cultures on the indigenous people.
  • Injustice and inequality in distribution of wealth and natural resources.
  • Refusal by the regime to accept fundamental changes, which made unity unattractive.

Today we are free to worship and to govern; this is what we are celebrating. While South Sudan can always do better to avoid repeating the above mistakes, South Sudanese should not regret their decision to declare independence from a regime that has oppressed them for over 50 years.

South Sudanese are proud, optimistic, and resilient people. Their long struggle for independence has proven these values. In the spirit of optimism and patriotism, the SPLA “Locust” (Koryom) Battalion sang in Arabic: “Faturna Tumbakna,” which means, “Our Tobacco is our Breakfast.” This song was in response to Khartoum claim that the guerilla soldiers would starve in the bush due to lack of food. Through resilient, our civilians survived the horrors of displacement by wandering in the unforgiving deserts and rivers that did not spare most of them; the survivors crossed the international borders to find refuge in foreign lands.

In celebrating our hard-earned freedom and recalling the torturous struggle that brought it, it is important to reflect on the overall meaning of this day. To me, this day means the struggle of a decent people for human dignity has finally paid off. It means our freedom fighters did not die in vain because through their ultimate sacrifice, we have achieved CPA, referendum, and the ultimate independence. Our challenge then becomes, how can each of us best honor these heroes? Can the citizens of South Sudan make personal pledges today and how to achieve them?

Looking forward in the context of my 3B’s equation, I think it is time to reduce more bloodshed, maintain the bullets for defense, and speed up the citizen access to the ballot box. In democratic governance, it follows that citizen participation is high or possible when an individual is not limited by fear, hunger, illiteracy, and disease.  When the government does not provide or protect individual rights to these necessities, it loses legitimacy and citizens can act. South Sudanese declared independence because Khartoum did not protect or deliver these basic rights.

Because the price of independence was exorbitant both in human lives and social costs, South Sudan must do everything it can to protect and preserve the prize of freedom. This includes delivering the “independence dividends” to its citizens; supporting the military; and taking good care of the wounded veterans, widows, and the orphans.

Happy Birthday South Sudan! May you prosper and remember those who have died for you!

——————————————————————————————

John Thon Majok, MPA, is a native of South Sudan. He lives and works in Washington DC.