Sudan Tribune Gurtong Trust WeakLeak Blog Garang Aher’s Blog Dusouth Blog Piööcku Thuongjang CNN The BBC The Economist Time Magazine The Atlantic Reuters News The AP–Associated Press The Guardian (UK) Washington Post Yahoo News Sam Harris Blog Draft for Writers Stanley Fish of the NYT The Philosopher’s Stone The NYT Opinionator Big_Think WidStudio (GWU) D.I.Y Education Open Culture Khan Academy Blog Ambassador David Shinn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
proposal from the gov’t
proposal from the rebels
proposal from IGAD leaders
PaanLuel Wël Media Ltd - South Sudan 
No third time compromise under Salva Kiir again
By Lam Wuor
Its very disturbance to compromise again and again with the same people and the same party which has ideology of depopulating other community in the country, the Arusha deal for party reunification is annoying many people, there should be no another compromise between victims and the perpetrators. Example, Any Anya II and Nasir faction compromised with John Garang because the Any Anya II and Nasir faction leadership had put the country interest first then power interest, however, that kindness of forgiveness is being used in negative thinking and that is why Salva Kiir said “ a dog lives with you at home and when you beat him he will runaway but still will come lay down near you because he has nowhere to go and live” killing the innocent Nuer civilians seems normal from Salva kiir comparing them like runaway dog from home especially children, women and men were targeted by state security and murdered because of being Nuer (one of the tribe in South Sudan) ethnic group. In a nutshell, the President of South Sudan doesn’t think that he is responsible for incident in which he personally ordered his presidential guards to target ethnic Nuer in the capital on December 16, 2013. In reality, the Nuer always accepts the compromise for love of peace in the country not a leadership weakness. In this case of the Nuer massacre there would be no such compromise again. Why we can’t take the best example from Eritrean people who fought for 50 years and they eventually achieved their objectives,I think better to be in exile then going back under Salva Kiir because he will consider it as failure while compromise exists when two parties try to find a halfway point for resolution. One advantage is that the outcome can generally be seen as fair to both parties because each gets something in return. This can also solve a short-term conflict while laying the foundation to resolving a long-term problem. The disadvantage of a compromise is that neither party leaves the negotiating table completely happy. Since compromises are short-term, they usually indicate that another conflict will occur in the future, This come through collaboration in which we called the win-win form of conflict resolution in which, at the end of negotiations, both parties feel they have gained something and no one feels as if they lost something, I courage you all to stand firm to defend our right and the future of our generation.
LikeLike
During South Sudan’s dry season between December and May, members of the Dinka tribe move from the highlands to the lowlands close to the river Nile
LikeLike